Sunday, March 19, 2017

Circumstances Change, But Paul Muni Doesn't in I Am A Fugitive From A Chain Gang

Raising social consciousness is commonly cited as the motivation behind crafting a classic film such as 1932's I Am A Fugitive From A Chain Gang. The theme of freedom is prominent throughout the film. Paul Muni's brilliant portrayal of a down-on-his-luck wanderer named James Allen consistently discusses man's desire to be free.


The Freedom Theme


Allen becomes a drifter because he wants to be free of his dull home life. Drafted into the army only to be discharged to face the monotony of a factory job, Allen makes his way across the country only to lose his freedom again after being falsely convicted of a crime and ending up serving his sentence on a brutal chain gang.


Escaping from the chain gang offers a brief respite of freedom and a new lease on life. And then he is trapped in a loveless marriage. Upon freeing himself from the union, he finds himself back on the chain gang.


Freedom, it seems, only comes and goes.


Or is, as the title self-aware computer of the sci-fi classic Colossus: The Forbin Project assesses, "Freedom is an illusion."


For James Allen, freedom is fleeting to the point it barely exists. Likely, for him, it never exists. He reinvents himself numerous times to achieve a level of personal and outright physical freedom. He changes jobs, changes his lot in life through a prison escape, changes his identity, and so on.


Freedom never arrives for James Allen because, although circumstances change, Allen never really changes. He is the symbolic ball and chain, which is tied to a literal ball and chain.




Chained to Unchanging Circumstances


Was James Allen predestined to be a prisoner both literally and figuratively? Based on his life, as seen in the film, this good, moral, virtuous man never changes. He remains the same individual from scene to scene, and he suffers greatly no matter what backdrop he is placed on.


James Allen's life on the outside of the chain gang mimics what life was like on the inside. And no, the notion of freedom is an illusion. There is a sameness to things. Allen tries to make changes in his life. Looking for a new job is less melodramatic than an escape from prison.


The ultimate sameness is James Allen himself.


*****



Check Out My Collection of Essays on Amazon Kindle!

*****

Allen simply cannot catch the proverbial break. No matter what circumstances the man finds himself in, things never work out well for him. The narrative of I Am A Fugitive From A Chain Gang consistently features ever-changing backdrops.


This is why life is so difficult for the man. He cannot fit well into any of the new lives he places himself or lands.


In a tragic sense of irony, James Allen finally does change in the film's final minutes - he loses his morality and virtue, allowing him to better fit into the backdrop of a fugitive.





Sunday, February 26, 2017

A Bit of Marketing Magic Could Have Helped 1977's Sorcerer

The box office failure of 1977's Sorcerer is consistently blamed on being released around the same time as Star Wars.

True. The gritty and realistic documentary-like thriller did come out the same month as the mega sci-fi hit.

So what?



The film should have done better, much better. The $21 million budget (more than what Star Wars cost!) would make Sorcerer a likely money loser. $50 million or so would be needed to break even. Earning $25 would lead to a loss. The losses obviously would be less than the case with $5 million in U.S. theaters, which the picture earned.


The failure is stunning considering Sorcerer was directed by William Friedkin, riding high with The French Connection and The Exorcist. Star Roy Scheider was coming off the success of JAWS.


Marketing -- poor marketing -- probably was the culprit that did Sorcerer in. The film received mediocre reviews, which definitely didn't help. Better marketing connecting the film to Friedkin and Scheider's other successes probably would have lent a box office assist.


The trouble with marketing Sorcerer is you need to stress that the movie is not about magic and fantasy. Yeah, the genre-jumbled title really worked against this 1970s classic. 



PLEASE CHECK OUT MY COLLECTION OF ESSAYS ON KINDLE/KINDLE UNLIMITED:

Universal Monsters & Neurotics: Creatures of the Night and Their Hang-Ups by Anthony M. Caro.

Read the Kindle Vella Sci-Fi Serial: Why is Cal Drawing Stick Figures at 3 AM in the 23rd Century?

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Dissecting Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed (1969)

In the continuing tradition of celebrating Halloween, I wrote a new Hub on a classic 1960's British horror film - Hammer's Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed.

Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed is -- arguably -- the second best Hammer Frankenstein film after the original Curse of Frankenstein. FMBD was a TV staple in the 1970's and 1980's on UHF and was notorious for its incredibly grim and downbeat subject matter. Hammer Frankenstein films were only marginally profitable in comparison to the Dracula films and would even be outperformed by the Karnstein vampire trilogy. The offbeat Doctor Jekyll and Sister Hyde would be a big (surprise) hit for Hammer, but the Frankenstein films just didn't ignite the box office. The next two films in the series The Horror of Frankenstein and Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell were a major step down in quality from FMBD...what a shame.

Please click the above link to read the full Hub - its a good one!


Friday, October 21, 2016

Famous Monsters of Filmland 40th Anniversary Filmbook Remembered

Happy Halloween!


So much I could say, but time is short.


Classic horror movies receive a lot of airtime on cable in October, which is a good thing. Several rare classics do not always get the same appreciation of more well-known features. Some movies may only end up airing during Halloween. Setting October aside to appreciate those classic creepy films is definitely a worthwhile endeavor.


Yesterday, I was in the bookstore and came across the new issue of the third version of Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine. Fittingly, it was a tribute to the late, great Forrest J. Ackermann.


In the late 1990s, the second version of the magazine -- published by Ray Ferry -- was released. A 40th-anniversary film book was published. Here are my thoughts on it - in video form.




AND PLEASE CHECK OUT MY KINDLE BOOK ON THE UNIVERSAL CLASSICS:



Saturday, August 13, 2016

Beyond Good and Evil and Greed in The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

What more could be written about the themes of greed-induced self-destruction in the John Huston/Humphrey Bogart classic The Treasure of the Sierra Madre? Perhaps it would be best to look at a few lines of dialogue from the film and ponder on the words.


"Do you believe the old man who was doing all the talking....said the other night about gold changing a man's soul so he ain't the same kind of a guy he was before finding it?"


"I guess that all depends on the man."


"That's exactly what I say. Gold don't carry any curse with it. It all depends on whether or not the guy who finds it is the right guy. The way I see it, gold can be as much of a blessing as a curse"


Greed is often viewed as an abstract, a "Deadly Sin" that controls those whom the feelings of avarice envelope. Greed is not an abstract concept. Nor is it something that takes hold and controls anyone. Greed is a description of the attitudes and actions of human beings. Greed comes in many levels of severity and can reach a point where the "sin" becomes a massive personality disorder.


Greed could be an asset "depending on the man." A greedy person who saves and works and works to have security in life cannot be faulty. Such a person has a strong work ethic and fear for personal security - traits that were likely developed over time based on life experiences.






The character of Dobbs appears like a man who descends into greed-induced, self-destructive paranoia after finding gold and being overly consumed with greed. Is this so?


"Gold don't carry any curse with it. It all depends on whether or not the guy who finds it is the right guy."


Dobbs likely embodied always embodied the terrible traits that consumed him throughout the film. He possessed those traits inwardly and, when he discovered the gold, his avarice, selfishness, and paranoia began to express themselves outwardly.


This is why the other characters do not get ruined by the gold. The reflected the "right person[s]" who could be entrusted with the great responsibility of discovering the untold riches of lost and hidden gold.






PLEASE CHECK OUT MY COLLECTION OF ESSAYS ON AMAZON KINDLE:



Wednesday, June 22, 2016

The Tortured Memories of The Pawnbroker (1965)

The opening scenes of director Sidney Lumet's The Pawnbroker (1965) display sweeping cinematography not often seen in contemporary films. The wide shots of the German landscape of the 1930s capture the beauty of the countryside. The cinematography hint there is a great deal to the world. So much to look forward to. Sol Nazerman has a wonderful wife and two children. His life is idyllic. And then the storybook world ends.


The same cinematography returns in the next scene to reveal the Long Island of the 1960s. The growing suburban landscape is vast and lonely. Sol Nazerman is much older. He sits in a chair by himself. Although he lives with family members, he keeps his misanthropic distance. Nazerman was close with his wife and children. He is not interested in being close with anyone again.


The symbolism of the suburban landscape is impossible to miss. In a mostly subtle film, the symbolism is jarring and obvious. The layout of the houses looks like a military-style prison camp. Although he left the camp, he never really left.




The Existential Prison

The symbolism is sadly appropriate for the one-time university professor. He spent years in a Nazi concentration camp and lost the wife and children he loved. Physically, Nazerman - brilliantly played by Rod Steiger in a legendary performance - was able to survive the camp, but he was stripped of his humanity and freedom. He survived but is no longer alive. Nazerman is mentally trapped in his own prison and by his new lot in life. As the proprietor of a pawn shop, Nazerman deals with the lost and those who skirt the law. His new career is a prison of sorts.

Nazerman may have chosen such a loathsome career path because doing so would have made it impossible for him to have any meaningful or serious interactions with others. He doesn't want them. This is not to say he doesn't need them. Sol Nazerman doesn't want social interactions.

Distance. Distance has a relationship with isolation. In the opening scenes at the pawn shop, Sol Nazerman keeps a massive distance from the customers who walk into his store. A sad sack, a cheery woman, and a rambling man looking for conversation are all ignored by Sol Nazerman. He doesn't want to interact with others. He prefers self-isolation. Sol doesn't like isolation. No one could. He has made a pact with his loneliness.

"I'm not particularly concerned with the future." These are the words he gives to a social worker collecting money for charity.




Memories of the Walking Dead

Sol maintains a relationship with Tessie, the widow of his friend Reuben Reuben was another person viciously killed in the concentration camp. The relationship is a ghost of the past. Sol cannot bring his wife back or recreate what once existed. Neither can the lonely Tessie. Sol Nazerman's attempts to end his loneliness through brief respites with the widow do nothing more than creating a burning, searing reminder of his isolation and loss. Nazerman continues to repeat the vicious cycle time and time. Perhaps he has the feeling things may sometimes change with the next visit. Things never change. The future does not change for Nazerman because the past cannot be changed.

Tessie's ill father Mendel has utter contempt for Sol Nazerman's approach to life.


“Share the dignity of death with those who really died….can you feel pain?”


“No.”


“You breathe. You eat. You walk. You make money. You take a dream and give a dollar.”


“I survived.”


“A coward’s survival and at a price. No passion. No pity….The walking dead.”


Mendel realizes the story Sol has to tell could be an inspiring one. Sol Nazerman has the potential to be a professor once again and educate the world. He won’t though. So, Mendel has his contempt.




Holding onto (and Forgetting) the Past

Mendel does not see the process Sol Nazerman has crafted. He has shut down all his emotions in order to blunt the pain, suffering, and trauma he feels. Nazerman has created a wall around himself to crush and suppress his emotions. This way, he is able to survive through life, albeit in a misanthropic, isolated way.


In fairness to Nazerman, his brutal flashbacks force his isolation. He does create a further psychological barrier by looking down on the lost souls who enter his pawn shop. Others do not realize that Nazerman suffers from a brutal post-traumatic stress disorder and is plagued by flashbacks. He has to keep a distance to keep the flashbacks brought on by visual associations at bay.


The strange obsession with money furthers Nazerman's goal of isolating himself. By concentrating all his efforts and time on making money, Nazerman can ignore other aspects of his life. He really doesn't care about the money. Earning money takes up all his time, which leaves him with no time to deal with other aspects of reality. Making money is a drug to numb pain and feelings.


When a drug addict appears in the shop to pawn a radio, Nazerman shows nonchalant disgust towards the young man. Doing so is little more than a reflection of his own self-loathing upon looking over the pawn counter to a mirror of himself.

*****

PLEASE CHECK OUT MY COLLECTION OF ESSAYS ON AMAZON KINDLE:





*****

Anger at the world fuels Sol Nazerman's self-loathing, but another emotional state is at the core of his feelings. The pawnbroker is swallowed by guilt. Nazerman feels horrific guilt over being the person who survived the concentration camp. He wonders why he wasn't the person taken away instead of his wife and children. The guilt turns into inner anger and hate. Nazerman is punishing himself for what happened in the camp.


And So Comes Renewal


Sol Nazerman, the pawnbroker, becomes someone who can be forgiven for all his misanthropic tendencies when we discover the core root of his pain. His wife was sexually abused in the concentration camp, and Nazerman carries the guilt of not being able to help her with him. We learn he has been laundering money for the mob, his morals cast aside due to his hatred for society. Upon discovering he has been laundering money derived from prostitution, Nazerman wants nothing - nothing at all - to do with the scheme. The pawnbroker is shocked back into humanity, and, while not too late, his return is still late.


Sol Nazerman realizes he lost many years of his life. He knows Mendel was right in his assessment of the pawnbroker's self-imposed miserable lot in life. Can he change? Truly change? There will always be a level of ambiguity to any answers.




Post-Script on The Pawnbroker

The 1960's and 1970's were both daring times for the motion picture industry. While television would slowly descend into sitcom and other formulas out of budget necessities, the motion picture industry was exploring into very experimental territory. Themes barely - or never - touched previously were being brought to the forefront. The controversies associated with The Pawnbroker were massive and, although the film was a mild box office success, its impact was profound. The Pawnbroker contributed mightily to the end of the Production Code and the Legion of Decency and helped spawn the MPAA rating system. 

Ironically, while television has become more daring and experimental these days, the motion picture industry is more formula-driven than ever before. Truly thought-provoking films such as The Pawnbroker are exceedingly rare.

Sunday, June 5, 2016

Edward G. Robinson: The Small Man Playing It Big In Key Largo

"This rain should cool things off, but it don't."

So says Edward G. Robinson in Key Largo.

Things don't cool off in Key Largo. They heat up.

The war hero returns from the battle only to discover a new fight at home. This plot convention has been used in a number of exploitation action movies, although it was arguably done best in the 1948 Humphrey Bogart/Edward G. Robinson classic.

A lot more is going on in the film that simply setting up a fight between Bogart's Frank McCloud, a war veteran, and Robinson's Johnny Rocco, a vicious gangster. Trapped in the microcosm of a hotel during a hurricane, the war hero, the innocent family, and the gangster crew, the motivations behind Rocco's evil are slowly revealed.


As the drama plays out in the hotel, we learn Rocco is a man who is driven by his own twisted ambitions and greed. The greed is not rooted in procuring huge amounts of material things, but to quell a harsh personality disorder and an inferiority complex. Bogart's character is able to battle the villain by slowly getting under his skin.

"He knows what he wants....He wants more...don't you Rocco?"

When asked if he will ever have enough, Rocco responds:

"Well, I never have....."

Bogart's McCloud reveals what he wants more than anything. "A world in which there is no place for Johnny Rocco." Ironically, when first given the chance to kill Rocco, McCloud throws a gun away not wanting to lower himself to the level of the gangster.


McCloud later makes the revelation that fighting Rocco is not his battle. He has no desire to put his life on the line to stop the gangster or get in the thug's way. McCloud has nothing but searing contempt for the gangster, but he isn't going to risk  - and likely lose - his life trying to stop Rocco.

Or will he? Perhaps McCloud simply does not want to give Rocco the satisfaction of seeing him as a "big deal". Rocco is a driven man, but he is driven by a desire for status. Criminal endeavors allow this sense of status, undeserved as it may be.

A world without people like Johnny Rocco would not be like anything found in the history of human civilization. There are always going to be petty people whose insecurities form the basis of their antisocial behavior. And Rocco's antisocial tendencies are all on display in the dramatics playing out in the hotel.

Within the microcosm of what takes place in a Key Largo, a small man like Johnny Rocco gives great insight into sociological (and sociopathic) problems in the world outside the hotel's doors.